The increase in people’s life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement. One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age. Is this alternative a positive or negative development?
In the technology-driven world, people had enormous chances to work with numerous facilities around them to be paid till the end. Although they work to the last part of their life, certain professions are not secure to meet their life needs. Compared with European countries, they provide end to end support and protection to their civilians for entire stages of their life. The given statement is an adequate remedy for solving this issue.
Firstly, as a fresh employee, he is more enthusiastic and energetic in the relevant field. He had the anxiety to understand the various stages of his employment. To achieve his goals, he works hard and grabs ideas. Several millionaires and business tycoons have directly entered the market or business at younger ages; moreover, they understand the ideas without any prior help.
Secondly, young professionals had numerous advantages in their preliminary stages. They had the capability to take risks. They are freshers in the fields and in order to cope up with these two abilities they will reach a stable level in their life. In addition, they had the ultimate freedom to change their jobs and find secure positions in their life. Additionally, they can convert their life to convinced stages of business too.
On the other hand, new joiners had several drawbacks in their initial life too. First and foremost is there is c major chance for fell into unorthodox life. Secondly, being a risk-taker will face its outcome. Whatever good or bad.
In conclusion, it is unavoidable and understandable that for a better tomorrow, we must work hard today. Lifetime working is not a solution for resolve overall issues in our life. Think wisely and choose better ways around us that perfectly fit us.
Follow Us on IELTSFever Twitter