In many countries, the law says that people must attend school until they become 18 years old. Does the advantage outweigh the disadvantages?
It is irrefutable that scholars have to attend school to gain knowledge and confidence. Whilst, there is common law in most of the nations that the inhabitants have to attend school at least up to 18 years old. In this essay, I intend to delve into the benefits of school going and how it can outweigh the demerits with illustrations in the forthcoming paragraphs.
First and foremost, the pupil has to attend school not only for the sake of the nation or their parents but also for themselves. To elaborate, the masses have to be literate, and the education system in all the countries has to surge dramatically. Moreover, if the citizens study well, at least up to a certain age, they can eradicate all outcomes, and the literacy rate can also increase in their homelands. To cite a pertinent illustration, basic knowledge for every denizen can sustain their life until their last breath. As a result, their nation can also improve in all aspects such as in business, employment, agriculture, like many.
On the other hand, if the government is providing free education for lower strata denizens, then they can even study until they can. Nevertheless, the literacy rate in almost all countries declined due to poverty, and they cannot afford money for their education. To exemplify, if the officials are providing education free of cost, then consequently, the literacy rate increases drastically.
To conclude, although there are a plethora of laws related to education, poverty is also there to survive and to study. Furthermore, the government authorities have to take necessary actions to implement free education until 18 years.
Follow Us on IELTSFever Twitter
Leave a Reply